luanonj8nv

The Baptism with the Holy Spirit is a very questionable topic within the Christian community. Although Christians of all denominations believe in a soteriology that includes a baptism with the Holy Spirit, theologically, all do not agree as to the time and manner in which a believer is baptized with the Holy Spirit.

It is our belief that the Holy Spirit baptism is guaranteed to every believer restored by faith in Christ. However, not every follower is baptized with the Holy Spirit at the time of conversion.

As we take a look at the New Testimony record discovered in the book of Acts, we will find, it is certainly possible to be converted to Christ and restored by the Spirit, however yet not get the experience referred to as the Baptism with the Holy Spirit till a long time afterward.

Why Must We Research Study the Book of Acts?

The book of Acts is the only history book in the New Testimony. Unlike the epistles, which are letters written to churches or people to advise followers in the faith; in Acts, Luke records with fantastic detail the historical setting and chronology of the first century church as it unfolds, from the time leading up to the day of Pentecost 33 ADVERTISEMENT and the years right away following.

While the epistles are written to those who had currently received the experience of the baptism with the Holy Spirit, the book of Acts alone offers the historical record of how some of the churches and individuals to whom the epistles were written were conserved and subsequently received the experience known as the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

Without studying the book of Acts, one can not comprehend or value the distinction in between being born once again of the Spirit and being baptized with the Spirit. The theological contribution of each historical account of early followers with the Holy Spirit is taped with such detail as to provide a consistent biblical theology with respect to New Testimony accounts of the Baptism with the Holy Spirit.

Although many preachers avoid the Holy Spirit phenomenon experienced https://gsavvas.gr/product/thema-onoma/ in Acts, or effort to explain away the ramifications of the facts provided there, to ignore or just disregard this genuine historical record is to be negligent of appropriately dividing the word of fact.

It is my opinion that the failure of many bible instructors to truthfully and accurately represent the biblical record in the book of Acts might be the sole reason why a large sector of the body of Christ is doing not have in the power of God and in understanding the operations of His Spirit.

Throughout the rest of this writing we will attempt to attend to the following:

1) What is the baptism with the Holy Spirit?

2) Is the baptism with the Holy Spirit subsequent to redemption or concurrent with salvation?

3) Exists is a difference between being baptized by the Spirit and being baptized with the Spirit?

4) What is the difference between receiving the present of the Holy Spirit speaking to other tongues and receiving the present of tongues?

5) Is there is a distinction between the function of speaking in other tongues as an indication and the purpose of the spiritual gift of scuba divers (diverse) type of tongues?

There are some who hold the view, to be born of the Spirit and to be baptized with the Spirit are essentially one and the indistinguishable experience. Others hold the view, to be born once again of the Spirit is indeed different from the baptism with the Spirit, however both always happen at the same time. Nevertheless, does the Acts' record assistance these positions?

Our study exposes, the Acts record reveals that some followers did experience the Baptism with the Holy Spirit subsequent to conversion and any public confession of faith in Christ, while others got the baptism with the Spirit prior to any public confession of faith in Christ.

As we take a look at the Acts record, we will quickly find that:

The Baptism with the Holy Spirit is certainly various from the Birth of the Spirit. When we examine both experiences carefully we find the following to be real:

1) The birth of the Spirit is an act of regrowth and the re-birth of the believer into Christ in redemption.

2) The baptism with the Spirit is an act of sanctification and the setting apart of the follower for service.

Why is this difference crucial?

In regeneration, every believer is baptized by the Spirit into (gk. eis) Christ.

In sanctification, every believer is baptized by Christ into (eis) the Holy Spirit

Into One Body, Into One Spirit.

The following scriptural references will reveal that there are 2 distinct operations of the Godhead with regard to being born-again of the Spirit and consequently being baptized with the Spirit.

" For by one Spirit are all of us baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or complimentary; and have been all made to consume into one Spirit" (1 Cor.12:13) KJV.

" And John bare record, stating, I saw the Spirit descending from paradise like a dove, and it residence upon him. And I understood him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the exact same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit coming down, and staying on him, the very same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost" (Jn. 1:32 -33) KJV.

The word by in 1 Cor. 12:13 describes the regenerative agency of the person of the Holy Spirit, while the word with in Jn. 1:33 explains the sanctifying agency of the individual of Christ. Although the Greek word en is translated in the Bible as by, with, in, and through, in the context of these bibles there can be no mistaking the reality that:

2 different individuals of the Godhead are involved in the operation (gk. energia) of being born of the Spirit and in the operation of being baptized with the Spirit.

Notification thoroughly, in one operation (regeneration) the Holy Spirit is the baptizer into Jesus Christ In the other operation (sanctification), Jesus Christ is the baptizer with and into the Holy Spirit

1) In regrowth > the Holy Spirit > is the baptizer > into Jesus Christ.

2) In sanctification > Jesus Christ > is the baptizer > into the Holy Spirit.

One might naturally ask, how is the believer baptized both with and into the Holy Spirit at the same time?

The word baptize ways to immerse, dip, or plunge. Accordingly, when a follower is baptized with the Holy Spirit he/she is baptized both with the Spirit and immersed into the Spirit, simply as a believer is baptized both with water and immersed into water.

The promise of the Daddy to give another comforter was satisfied on the day of Pentecost A.D. 33 when He began to put out of His Spirit upon all flesh. The Dad works all things through the ended up work of His Child, Jesus Christ, by the Holy Spirit.

Jesus stated that the Holy Spirit was not yet offered since He was not yet glorified. This suggests that the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus (the finished work of Christ) had to occur before the Holy Spirit might be provided to men. Prior to the day of Pentecost the disciples were given what is called the breath of promise (Jn. 20:22).

The Baptism of Regeneration

The baptism by the Spirit into Christ is also called the baptism of regeneration. It is the exact same experience mentioned by Paul in Titus 3:5 as the cleaning of regeneration.

We must be careful here, since although the word cleaning is utilized in this verse; notice, the words water or water baptism is not. Subsequently, this verse is not inferring baptismal regeneration by water as some incorrectly teach. This verse does, nevertheless, teach baptismal regrowth by the Spirit

The word washing (gk: loutron) in Titus 3:5 has nothing to do with water baptism, other than in a figurative sense. In as much as, baptism with water shows what the Spirit has already achieved in regrowth. Therefore, Paul concludes that the washing of regrowth and the restoring of the believer is of the Holy Spirit.

In summary, the new-birth by the Spirit restores the follower and positions the believer into the Body of Christ. The Baptism with the Holy Spirit consequently sanctifies the believer and is an endowment of power (gk. dunamis) gearing up the believer for service in order to satisfy the fantastic commission.

There is One Baptism with the Holy Spirit.

In Ephesians 4:5 Paul writes that there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism. What does this suggest?

It is uncertain whether this verse refers to water baptism or Sprit baptism; the context does not say. Although the Greek word utilized here is baptisma and it is used in the New Testimony with water baptism, the Greek word for baptize is used to both water baptism and the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

In the matter of the Spirit, there is just one baptism with the Spirit. Nevertheless, there are lots of re-fillings of the Spirit. So, when Paul composes, be not drunk with white wine, but be filled with the Spirit, it is an imperative to all followers to live constantly under the power and impact of the Holy Spirit instead of under the impact of alcohol and drugs.

Although a follower may be baptized with the Holy Spirit only when, the follower may continuously consume into one Spirit and be filled and re-filled lot of times throughout the follower's lifetime.

Have you got the Holy Ghost because you believed?

Is every believer presumed to be baptized with the Holy Spirit right away upon believing in Christ? Some teach this, however:

In Acts chapter 19 there is an event where Paul found certain former disciples of John the Baptist and inquired a remarkable concern: Have you received the Holy Ghost considering that ye believed?

Now, if every believer is instantly presumed to be baptized with the Holy Spirit upon faith, conversion, and regrowth, then Paul's concern to these disciples makes no sense at all.

The only way Paul's concern makes good sense is if there was an expectation of a pending subsequent experience of the Holy Spirit after faith, conversion, and regrowth by the Spirit.

This fact is also born out in another interesting account discovered in Acts chapter 8 where the Samaritans pertained to faith in Christ, were even baptized in water, but did not receive the Baptism with the Holy Spirit until the apostles, Peter and John came and laid their hands upon them.

These two accounts in addition to others in Acts, prove that there is a baptism with the Holy Spirit that is a different and unique experience from the birth of the Spirit.

These Indications Shall Follow Them That Believe

There is an essential and necessary connection in between faith and any operation of the Spirit; whether it is related to salvation, healing, wonders, and so on. This is likewise real of the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

Numerous followers can believe in Christ for redemption, but can not believe in him for other things such as magnificent healing or in this case the baptism with the Spirit.

There are lots of factors for this. Lack of appropriate teaching and understanding in this area causes absence of faith. An absence of faith and unbelief will prevent a conserved person from receiving the Holy Spirit baptism.

We are told more than when in scripture that faith in Christ is a requirement for getting the baptism with the Holy Spirit. Jesus said, He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath stated, out of his stubborn belly will flow rivers of living water.

There are two Greek words used in scripture to signify the difference in between receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit (evidenced by talking with other tongues) and the spiritual gift of tongues. They are: dorea and charisma.

This is a crucial distinction due to the fact that, one much first get the gift (dorea) of the Holy Spirit before one may receive an individual gift (charisma) or gifts of the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit baptism with the sign or evidence of consulting with other tongues ought to not to be confused with the present of tongues utilized in prayer, appreciation, and prediction.

An unfamiliar fact is, the word dorea (gift) is always used in bible to distinguish the gift of the Holy Spirit evidenced by talking to other tongues, while the word charisma (present) is always used of the present of tongues.

Whenever consulting with other tongues is described in Acts in connection with the baptism with the Holy Spirit the word dorea is always utilized. However, whenever speaking in tongues is used somewhere else in the New Testament, the word charm is utilized to represent the spiritual gift.

So, when Paul asks the concern, do all speak to tongues; he is describing the spiritual present (charm) and not to the present (dorea) of the Holy Spirit with the sign of speaking with other tongues.

It has actually been my experience to observe that a follower may in reality speak with other tongues at the time of their baptism with the Holy Spirit, but may never consequently receive or run in the gift of tongues at all.

The charm gift of tongues is described in bible as divers kinds (gk. genos) of tongues and varieties (genos) of tongues. This is because there are basically two unique classifications or kinds (genos) of the gift of tongues. There are devotional and prophetic tongues and each has a different function and function.

Devotional tongues are a prayer and praise language - its function is, guy talking to God, and its function is to edify the individual believer. Prophetic tongues are a language of prophecy - its function is, God speaking with man. When coupled with the present of analysis of tongues its function is to edify the entire church.

It is prophesying in tongues (when God speaks with guy) that requires analysis. However, prayer offered in tongues (when male speaks with God) does not need an interpretation, because the speaker is really hoping to God and not speaking to guy, God does not need an interpreter.

The distinction being, praying in tongues edifies the one doing the hoping, while prophesying in tongues edifies the entire church. For this reason prediction in tongues must be translated.

During the baptism with the Spirit, a follower might talk with either a devotional or prophetic language which is unknown to the speaker. This will be a sign to all present but specifically those who think not.

It is frequently taught that those who believe not refer to unsaved individuals. However, this is just partly appropriate. Those who believe not, might also describe anybody (conserved or not) who is unlearned and does not believe in the power of God to cast out devils, talk to brand-new tongues, recover the sick, etc,.

When Jesus said, these signs will follow them that think, he was likewise stating that supernatural symptoms of the power of God (signs) would follow those who have faith. However, if they do not have faith these indications will not follow them.

Probably, no account in Acts is more revealing than chapter 8 with regard to the baptism with the Holy Spirit being an experience separate and distinct from regeneration.

In Acts 8 Phillip the Evangelist preaches the gospel to Samaria where many think and are baptized. However, it is specifically made clear that it was not till the apostles Peter and John concerned town and laid their hands on them that they received the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

The question stays, if there was no proof of this experience, then how did Simon the sorcerer and others know the Holy Spirit had fallen on the followers in Samaria? Because, he like the others witnessed the signs that were done.

And let us not forget the family of Cornelius the very first Gentile converts to Christ, who got the baptism with the Holy Spirit talking to tongues while Peter yet preached Christ unto them.

The only indication that accompanied the baptism with the Holy Ghost in the bible was that of talking with other tongues as the Spirit offered utterance.

Some bible teachers have actually attempted to rationalize the phenomenon of saved believers who did not receive the baptism with the Holy Spirit till sometime later. They teach in order for the Jews, Samaritans, and Gentile countries (as a people group) to receive the preliminary in-filling of the Holy Spirit an apostle needed to exist to accredit them.

In addition, some teach, as soon as each people group got the Holy Spirit baptism through the laying on of hands of an apostle, there was no longer an expectation of receiving the baptism with the Holy Spirit with the indication of speaking in tongues. Interestingly, the bible does not support this theory, and it totals up to nothing more than speculation.

Lastly, our last example of a saved person getting the baptism with the Holy Ghost subsequent to redemption and conversion is the apostle Paul himself. Whom, having actually had actually hands laid on him by Ananias (who was not an apostle) received his sight and was at the same time baptized and filled with the Holy Spirit.

At any time the book of Acts supplies an account where believers initially get the Holy Spirit, it might be considered as the baptism or the in-filling with the Holy Spirit. Nevertheless, keep in mind, there is only one baptism with the Holy Spirit however lots of re-fillings.

What is the distinction in between a Pentecostal and a Charming?

There is a difference in between a Pentecostal and a Charming. Pentecostals hold to the teaching that the baptism with the Holy Ghost is always with the evidence (or indication) of speaking with other tongues.

Charismatics, however, are believers who have gotten the baptism with the Holy Spirit evidenced by speaking with other tongues, while they were members of other denominations or groups besides classical Pentecostal groups.

In addition, unlike Pentecostals, Charismatics consult with tongues and run in other spiritual presents, but do not always hold that the baptism with the Spirit is constantly evidenced by speaking to other tongues. Some Charismatics hold that the baptism with the Spirit may be evidenced by other presents of the Spirit such as recovery, prophecy, and so on

. In conclusion, it is difficult to develop a constant and scriptural theology of the experience referred to as the baptism with the Holy Spirit without examining the accounts referenced in the book of Acts.

We verify there is a distinct Christian experience in the Bible described as the baptism with the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit baptism is an endowment of power to gear up the follower to witness for Christ and to carry out the excellent commission.

The Holy Spirit Baptism is subsequent to salvation and might occur at the very same time as redemption. However, being baptized with the Spirit in sanctification is an unique work of the Godhead apart from being baptized by the Spirit in regeneration.

There is likewise a distinction between getting the gift (dorea) of the Holy Ghost and receiving the gift (charm) of tongues. And although speaking in tongues can serve a double function and function (devotional or prophetic) all at once, there is a difference in between the function and purpose of speaking in other tongues as a sign and the spiritual gift of diverse kinds (genos) of tongues.

The baptism with the Holy Ghost is an integral part of the Christian experience, and these indications will follow them that believe.